2016 head-to-head · Subcompact Car
2016 Buick Cascada vs Volkswagen Eos
MPG, range and what each one really costs you to fuel, from official EPA ratings and recalculated with your own gas and electricity prices.
FWD · 1.6L 4-cyl turbo · 6-speed automatic · 23 MPG
FWD · 2.0L 4-cyl turbo · 6-speed dual-clutch · 25 MPG
The 2016 Buick Cascada is the cheaper one to run. Driving 15,000 miles a year with $3.10/gal regular gas and $3.95/gal premium gas, it costs about $2,022 a year to fuel (23 MPG), versus $2,370 for the 2016 Volkswagen Eos (25 MPG). That's roughly $348 a year, or about $1,741 over five years.
Your numbers
Change these to match your driving and local prices. Every figure and chart on this page updates.
Fuel cost over 10 years
- Buick Cascada
- Volkswagen Eos
Side by side
| Buick Cascada | Volkswagen Eos | |
|---|---|---|
| $2,022 | Your annual fuel cost | $2,370 |
| 23 MPG | Combined efficiency | 25 MPG |
| 20 MPG | City | 22 MPG |
| 27 MPG | Highway | 30 MPG |
| 82 cu ft | Passenger volume | 77 cu ft |
| 9 cu ft | Cargo volume | 11 cu ft |
| 394 g/mi | Tailpipe CO₂ (g/mi) | 354 g/mi |
| 5/10 | EPA fuel economy score | 6/10 |
| 5/10 | EPA greenhouse gas score | 6/10 |
| Gas | Powertrain | Gas |
| Regular gasoline | Fuel | Premium gasoline |
| 1.6L 4-cyl turbo | Engine / motor | 2.0L 4-cyl turbo |
| 6-speed automatic | Transmission | 6-speed dual-clutch |
| FWD | Drivetrain | FWD |
✓ marks the better value. EPA scores run 1–10 (10 is best). Volumes come from the EPA interior volume index and aren't published for every body style.
Buick Cascada vs Volkswagen Eos across model years
- Buick Cascada
- Volkswagen Eos
Annual fuel cost of the most efficient configuration of each model year, at your prices. Click a point to open that year.
How they differ
Per EPA interior volume figures, the Buick Cascada has more passenger space (82 vs. 77 cu ft); the Volkswagen Eos has more cargo space (11 vs. 9 cu ft).
Among 39 2016 subcompact cars, the Buick Cascada ranks 16th and the Volkswagen Eos 25th for lowest fuel cost.
Frequently asked questions
Which is more fuel-efficient, the 2016 Buick Cascada or the 2016 Volkswagen Eos?
Measured by cost to drive, the Buick Cascada. The Buick Cascada is rated 23 MPG combined and the Volkswagen Eos 25 MPG (EPA, most efficient configuration of each).
How much does it cost to fuel the 2016 Buick Cascada vs. the Volkswagen Eos per year?
At 15,000 miles a year with $3.10/gal regular gas and $3.95/gal premium gas, about $2,022 for the Buick Cascada and $2,370 for the Volkswagen Eos.
Which has more cargo space?
The Volkswagen Eos, with 11 cu ft of luggage volume versus 9 cu ft (EPA interior volume index).
More 2016 comparisons
Buick Cascada vs…
Or compare the 2016 Buick Cascada with anything else: