2016 head-to-head · Subcompact Car

2016 Roush Performance Mustang vs Toyota Mirai

MPG, range and what each one really costs you to fuel, from official EPA ratings and recalculated with your own gas and electricity prices.

Swap sides
✓ Cheaper to run
$3,485/ year to fuel
17 MPG
✓ Cheaper to run
$8,060/ year to fuel
67 MPGe

FWD · Electric motor (56 kW) · CVT · 67 MPGe

The 2016 Roush Performance Mustang is the cheaper one to run. Driving 15,000 miles a year with $3.95/gal premium gas and $36.00/kg hydrogen, it costs about $3,485 a year to fuel (17 MPG), versus $8,060 for the 2016 Toyota Mirai (67 MPGe). That's roughly $4,574 a year, or about $22,872 over five years.

Your numbers

Change these to match your driving and local prices. Every figure and chart on this page updates.

Fuel cost over 10 years

  • Roush Performance Mustang
  • Toyota Mirai

Side by side

Roush Performance MustangToyota Mirai
$3,485 Your annual fuel cost $8,060
17 MPG Combined efficiency 67 MPGe
14 MPG City 67 MPGe
23 MPG Highway 67 MPGe
— Driving range 312 mi
82 cu ft Passenger volume 86 cu ft
12 cu ft Cargo volume 9 cu ft
537 g/mi Tailpipe CO₂ (g/mi) 0 g/mi
3/10 EPA fuel economy score 10/10
3/10 EPA greenhouse gas score 10/10
Gas Powertrain Fuel cell
Premium gasoline Fuel Hydrogen
5.0L 8-cyl supercharged Engine / motor Electric motor (56 kW)
6-speed automatic Transmission CVT
RWD Drivetrain FWD

✓ marks the better value. EPA scores run 1–10 (10 is best). Volumes come from the EPA interior volume index and aren't published for every body style.

Roush Performance Mustang vs Toyota Mirai across model years

  • Roush Performance Mustang
  • Toyota Mirai

Annual fuel cost of the most efficient configuration of each model year, at your prices. Click a point to open that year.

How they differ

Per EPA interior volume figures, the Toyota Mirai has more passenger space (86 vs. 82 cu ft); the Roush Performance Mustang has more cargo space (12 vs. 9 cu ft).

Among 39 2016 subcompact cars, the Roush Performance Mustang ranks 33rd and the Toyota Mirai 39th for lowest fuel cost.

The powertrains differ: the Roush Performance Mustang is a conventional gas model, while the Toyota Mirai is a hydrogen fuel-cell vehicle.

Frequently asked questions

Which is more fuel-efficient, the 2016 Roush Performance Mustang or the 2016 Toyota Mirai?

Measured by cost to drive, the Roush Performance Mustang. The Roush Performance Mustang is rated 17 MPG combined and the Toyota Mirai 67 MPGe (EPA, most efficient configuration of each).

How much does it cost to fuel the 2016 Roush Performance Mustang vs. the Toyota Mirai per year?

At 15,000 miles a year with $3.95/gal premium gas and $36.00/kg hydrogen, about $3,485 for the Roush Performance Mustang and $8,060 for the Toyota Mirai.

Which has more cargo space?

The Roush Performance Mustang, with 12 cu ft of luggage volume versus 9 cu ft (EPA interior volume index).

Roush Performance Mustang vs Toyota Mirai in other years

More 2016 comparisons

Or compare the 2016 Roush Performance Mustang with anything else:

Keep exploring