2017 head-to-head · Subcompact Car

2017 Ford Mustang vs Mitsubishi i-MiEV

MPG, range and what each one really costs you to fuel, from official EPA ratings and recalculated with your own gas and electricity prices.

Swap sides
✓ Cheaper to run
$1,938/ year to fuel
24 MPG
✓ Cheaper to run
$810/ year to fuel
112 MPGe

RWD · Electric motor (49 kW) · Single-speed · 112 MPGe · 59 mi

The 2017 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is the cheaper one to run. Driving 15,000 miles a year with $3.10/gal regular gas and 18¢/kWh electricity, it costs about $810 a year to fuel (112 MPGe), versus $1,938 for the 2017 Ford Mustang (24 MPG). That's roughly $1,128 a year, or about $5,638 over five years.

Your numbers

Change these to match your driving and local prices. Every figure and chart on this page updates.

Fuel cost over 10 years

  • Ford Mustang
  • Mitsubishi i-MiEV

Side by side

Ford MustangMitsubishi i-MiEV
$1,938 Your annual fuel cost $810
24 MPG Combined efficiency 112 MPGe
21 MPG City 121 MPGe
30 MPG Highway 102 MPGe
— Electricity use (kWh/100 mi) 30 kWh
— Driving range 59 mi
82 cu ft Passenger volume 85 cu ft
12 cu ft Cargo volume 13 cu ft
370 g/mi Tailpipe CO₂ (g/mi) 0 g/mi
5/10 EPA fuel economy score 10/10
5/10 EPA greenhouse gas score 10/10
— Charge time at 240V 7 hrs
Gas Powertrain Electric
Regular gasoline Fuel Electricity
2.3L 4-cyl turbo Engine / motor Electric motor (49 kW)
6-speed manual Transmission Single-speed
RWD Drivetrain RWD

✓ marks the better value. EPA scores run 1–10 (10 is best). Volumes come from the EPA interior volume index and aren't published for every body style.

Ford Mustang vs Mitsubishi i-MiEV across model years

  • Ford Mustang
  • Mitsubishi i-MiEV

Annual fuel cost of the most efficient configuration of each model year, at your prices. Click a point to open that year.

How they differ

Per EPA interior volume figures, the Mitsubishi i-MiEV has more passenger space (85 vs. 82 cu ft); the Mitsubishi i-MiEV has more cargo space (13 vs. 12 cu ft).

Among 43 2017 subcompact cars, the Ford Mustang ranks 13th and the Mitsubishi i-MiEV 2nd for lowest fuel cost.

Because the Mitsubishi i-MiEV is fully electric, it has no tailpipe emissions and its running cost depends almost entirely on your electricity rate. Cheap overnight home charging widens its advantage over the Ford Mustang; relying on DC fast chargers can erase it.

Frequently asked questions

Which is more fuel-efficient, the 2017 Ford Mustang or the 2017 Mitsubishi i-MiEV?

Measured by cost to drive, the Mitsubishi i-MiEV. The Ford Mustang is rated 24 MPG combined and the Mitsubishi i-MiEV 112 MPGe (EPA, most efficient configuration of each).

How much does it cost to fuel the 2017 Ford Mustang vs. the Mitsubishi i-MiEV per year?

At 15,000 miles a year with $3.10/gal regular gas and 18¢/kWh electricity, about $1,938 for the Ford Mustang and $810 for the Mitsubishi i-MiEV.

Which has more cargo space?

The Mitsubishi i-MiEV, with 13 cu ft of luggage volume versus 12 cu ft (EPA interior volume index).

More 2017 comparisons

Or compare the 2017 Ford Mustang with anything else:

Keep exploring