2023 head-to-head · Midsize Car
2023 Audi e-tron GT vs Volvo S90 Plug-in Hybrid
MPG, range and what each one really costs you to fuel, from official EPA ratings and recalculated with your own gas and electricity prices.
AWD · Electric motor · 2-speed automatic · 82 MPGe · 238 mi
AWD · 2.0L 4-cyl turbo · 8-speed automatic · 66 MPGe + 30 MPG
The 2023 Audi e-tron GT is the cheaper one to run. Driving 15,000 miles a year with 18¢/kWh electricity and $3.95/gal premium gas, it costs about $1,115 a year to fuel (82 MPGe), versus $1,527 for the 2023 Volvo S90 Plug-in Hybrid (66 MPGe + 30 MPG). That's roughly $412 a year, or about $2,059 over five years.
Your numbers
Change these to match your driving and local prices. Every figure and chart on this page updates.
Fuel cost over 10 years
- Audi e-tron GT
- Volvo S90 Plug-in Hybrid
Side by side
| Audi e-tron GT | Volvo S90 Plug-in Hybrid | |
|---|---|---|
| $1,115 | Your annual fuel cost | $1,527 |
| 82 MPGe | Combined efficiency | 66 MPGe + 30 MPG |
| 81 MPGe | City | 66 MPGe / 28 MPG |
| 83 MPGe | Highway | 67 MPGe / 33 MPG |
| 41.3 kWh | Electricity use (kWh/100 mi) | 48 kWh |
| 238 mi | Driving range | 520 mi |
| — | All-electric range | 38 mi |
| 101 cu ft | Passenger volume | 102 cu ft |
| 11 cu ft | Cargo volume | 14 cu ft |
| 0 g/mi | Tailpipe CO₂ (g/mi) | 110 g/mi |
| 10/10 | EPA fuel economy score | 8/10 |
| 10/10 | EPA greenhouse gas score | 10/10 |
| 10.5 hrs | Charge time at 240V | 5 hrs |
| Electric | Powertrain | Plug-in hybrid |
| Electricity | Fuel | Premium gas + electricity |
| Electric motor | Engine / motor | 2.0L 4-cyl turbo |
| 2-speed automatic | Transmission | 8-speed automatic |
| AWD | Drivetrain | AWD |
✓ marks the better value. EPA scores run 1–10 (10 is best). Volumes come from the EPA interior volume index and aren't published for every body style.
Audi e-tron GT vs Volvo S90 Plug-in Hybrid across model years
- Audi e-tron GT
- Volvo S90 Plug-in Hybrid
Annual fuel cost of the most efficient configuration of each model year, at your prices. Click a point to open that year.
How they differ
The Volvo S90 Plug-in Hybrid goes farther between stops: about 520 miles on a full tank and charge, compared with 238 miles for the Audi e-tron GT.
Per EPA interior volume figures, the Volvo S90 Plug-in Hybrid has more cargo space (14 vs. 11 cu ft).
Among 50 2023 midsize cars, the Audi e-tron GT ranks 12th and the Volvo S90 Plug-in Hybrid 22nd for lowest fuel cost.
Because the Audi e-tron GT is fully electric, it has no tailpipe emissions and its running cost depends almost entirely on your electricity rate. Cheap overnight home charging widens its advantage over the Volvo S90 Plug-in Hybrid; relying on DC fast chargers can erase it.
Frequently asked questions
Which is more fuel-efficient, the 2023 Audi e-tron GT or the 2023 Volvo S90 Plug-in Hybrid?
Measured by cost to drive, the Audi e-tron GT. The Audi e-tron GT is rated 82 MPGe combined and the Volvo S90 Plug-in Hybrid 66 MPGe + 30 MPG (EPA, most efficient configuration of each).
How much does it cost to fuel the 2023 Audi e-tron GT vs. the Volvo S90 Plug-in Hybrid per year?
At 15,000 miles a year with 18¢/kWh electricity and $3.95/gal premium gas, about $1,115 for the Audi e-tron GT and $1,527 for the Volvo S90 Plug-in Hybrid.
Which has more range?
The Volvo S90 Plug-in Hybrid: about 520 miles versus 238 miles.
Which has more cargo space?
The Volvo S90 Plug-in Hybrid, with 14 cu ft of luggage volume versus 11 cu ft (EPA interior volume index).
Audi e-tron GT vs Volvo S90 Plug-in Hybrid in other years
More 2023 comparisons
Audi e-tron GT vs…
Or compare the 2023 Audi e-tron GT with anything else: